C++ Are lvalues, rvalues, glvalues, xvalues, making you leave the party?

No need. Please read this first.

“New” Value Terminology (Bjarne Stroustrup)

The most priceless gem in there (at least for me):

Dennis Ritchie used “lvalue” to describe C (e.g. see [K&R,1978]), but left out “rvalue”, considering “lvalue” and “not lvalue” sufficient.

Stroke of a genius, in it’s true form.

ps: if you are of a less abstract disposition, please consider this article. One of the better explanations on the subject.

%d bloggers like this: