Or in any case to a very large portion of programming population. And as much as we are “progressing” with dramatically changing C++98 from 11 to 17 and beyond, that much it seems people at large are regressing in grasping the concepts of C++ standard library. Continue reading “std namespace is notorious C++?”
[April 19th, 2006]
Recently while having some discussions on a forum populated with very good C++ developers, I started to realise …
Many of them do not see the reality same as I do? Most of the discussions are simply because of reality checks that developers have to do all the time. Especailly if they are in this IT industry where constant change is the name of the game.
Simple example : STL. Discusion exploded arround the issue of using or not using the STL in the code? A drastic example of an reality check missing. Here is why:
- STL does not exist any more. At least two years.
- STL is replaced with stdlib : standard library for C++
- Standard C++ has stdlib at its core. It is based on stdlib.
Three points from the reality of C++ today. Have you done your C++ reality check, yet 🙂 ?